DMITRI ZAVADSKY
In English ïà-áåëàðóñêó ïî-ðóññêè
THE PROOF OF GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ZAVADSKY AND THE OTHER MISSING ONES
THE FACTS

THE PROOF

CASE HISTORY

FAMILY PHOTOS

LUKASHENKO HUMOR PAGE

STATEMENTS OF DIMA'S WIFE


INTERVIEW OF DIMA'S MOM


JOIN MY FIGHT

LINKS

MAIN PAGE
-The official report of colonel Alkaeva, addressed to Minister of Internal Affairs of Byelorussia to the general - major of militia Naumov, dated 23.11.2000 with the visa minister. Confidentially 1.

-The official REPORT

-I Report, that, being the chief of the special group on execution of death sentences, I have been acquainted with commander of SOBR, Dmitry' Pavlichenko under the following circumstances: At the end of October 1999, 22/10, to be exact, under the order of former minister of Ministry of Internal Affairs Sivakov,
given to me by chief S.A.'s Kadushko of Ministry of Internal Affairs to me, Commander of SOBR, Dmitri Pavlichenko was allowed to be presence at executions. The purpose of his presence to me is not clear and unknown. Nobody said anything to me about it. This day, five people were to be executed. Pavlichenko was present at shooting of each person. In one of the moments he asked the executor why he shoots at a head, instead of in heart, having declared thus, that
Dmitri Pavlichenko
the shot in heart is more more humane and thus less blood follows. It has made some impression as such words that only a person with practice of killing could tell about the character of wounds in various areas of a body to a executioner. On the ending of all executions, Pavlichenko left, and was not present at the burial place of the corpses. Repeatedly in December, Pavlichenko personally came and was interested, when there will be further
sentences of execution. I have explained to him, that I personally am not authorized permit his presence. It is more did not meet after this.. Besides I want to explain, that twice, under the order of minister Sivakova J.L., directed to me, for unknown purposes. the special pistol with the silencer which was used for the executions was obtained on demand. First time 30.04 also is returned 14.05. Second time 16.09 also is returned 18.09.99. First time, on written order
from deputy minister Chvankina A.A. The pistol was received by the colonel of militia Dik V.I. and he had returned also. Second time, the pistol was received personally by aide-de-camp of minister named Vladimir Pavlovich. The possesion of the weapon is noted in a log-book of issue of the weapon,

Chief of confinement certer,Colonel Alkaeva.

29.11.2000
The official report from the chief of senior management of criminal militia of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Gen.-major of militia Lopatika, addressed to Minister of Internal Affairs of Byelorussia to the general - major of militia Naumov, dated 21.11.2000 with the visa of minister ' perfomed 21.11.2000.

OFFICIAL REPORT

I Report that I received  information of the following contents: in  April, 1999, Sheiman V.V., had given the instruction to  Minister of Internal Affais, Sivakov, J.L of confinement center #1 Municipal Department of Internal Affairs Mingorispolkoma to admit Commander Dmitri Pavlichenko for the punitive shooting sentences and the subsequent actions at the burial places. Sivakov J.L. having been given instructions, transmitted to chief of confinement center No.1, Dmitri.Pavlichenko was allowed to be present at the procedure and on request, to be issued the pistol by which the sentences on execution are carried out. Sivakov J.L. had given Alkaev the instruction to issue the pistol stored with him, and Alkaev carried out the order. At present Shejman V.V. had given instruction to Pavlichenco to physically destroy Zaharenko Y.N. Information of site of carrying out the actionsby Pavlichenko was provided by Vasilchenko N.V.'s with special division. Vasilchenko's orders
where given to him by Shejman V.V. through the employees. The of of abduction and subsequent execution of Zaharenko was performed by Pavlichenko, the commander of SOBR and four of his soldiers of the first special police company. On May, 8, 1999, Pavlichenko returned the execution pistolto Alkaev. (Zaharenko disappeared on May 7). On a similar combination September, 16, 1999 Pavlichenko abducted and destroyed Gonchar V.I.'s and Krasovsky A.S. Then the corpses of Zaharenko J.N., Gonchara V.I. and Krasovsky A.S., were buried at the Northern cemetery.

Chief MVD the Ministry of Internal Affairs the general - major of militia Lopatik

November, 21, 2000
Records from the book of issue and acceptance of the weapon and an ammunition to staff of confinement center No. 1 Departments of Internal Affairs Minoblispolkoma.

Chief of the convinement center - the Colonel Alkaeva: Twice, under the order of minister Sivakova J.L., for purposes unknown, the special pistol with the silencer which was used to carry out executions was obtained on demand. First time 30.04 also is returned 14.05. Second time 16.09 also is returned 18.09.99

Yury Zaharenko has disappeared 7.05.99

Victor Gonchar and Anatoly Krasovsky - 16.09.99

Chief MVD the Ministry of Internal Affairs the general - major of militia Lopatik November, 21, 2000
The decision about the purpose(assignment) of examinations from 10.08.2000 within the framework of investigation of criminal case N 414100

THE DECISION
about purpose(assignment) complex judicial and criminal examinations.
August, 10, 2000. Minsk

The public prosecutor of the department of Supervision, a body of the Office of Public Prosecutor, internal affairs, to CPD, the Byelorussian transport Office of Public Prosecutor of ml. The adviser of justice V.D.Shibutko, having considered the material of criminal case No. 19/17-2000, opened 10.07.2000 on the basis of the crime stipulated by item 101 UK of Byelorussia, deliberate abduction/under the application of the head of special information projects of broadcasting company 'ORT' RussianFederation with Sheremeta P.G. about disappearance of the television cameraman of the Byelorussian bureau of the specified broadcasting company of Zavadsky D.A.,-
THE DECISION: July, 7, 2000 at 10:10, the television cameraman of the Byelorussian bureau of broadcasting company ORT, Zavadsky D.A. in the service automobile marked Forman-Shkoda, 03-18 KE, had left his house for national airport ' Minsk - 2 ' for a meeting with head of ORT department of broadcasting, Sheremet, P.G. whose plane arrived the same day from airport ' Sheremetava-1 ' to airport Minsk - 2 by flight B-2 No. 1992 at 11:11 minutes.

However Zavadsky D.A. did not meet him, and the motor vehicle of mark 'Forman-Shkoda' was found outside the building of the air terminal. Measures were undertaken to establish the whereabouts of television cameraman Zavadsky D.A. and of the circumstance of his disappearance.

During realization of investigation - operative actions for the specified criminal case, 03.08.2000, the motor vehicle of mark 'Vol'kswagen-golf' detained. Number 53-85 KA, belonging ot Ignatovich V.A., who was seen on the eve of disappearance, It was noticed near tje house resided by Zavadsky, D.A.. A search of the specified motor vehicle on 04.08.2000 in the interior and in athe trunk revealedr a brown a stain, similar to blood, various sizes and a configuration which are withdrawn, placed in separate envelopes No.2, No. 3 and No.4

In the motor vehicle a bag with a stain of brown color was found packages No.1/ three jackets, No. 6, No. 7 and No. 8 three trousers, No. 9,10 and No. 11 also were withdrawn. On jackets and trousers are stains of the brown color, similar to blood. During the search, package No.5, twenty two sticky films with microparticles from interior andtrunk were found, package No. 12, and samples of the floor covering, coverings seats and doors subsequently, packages No.13, No. 14 and No.15 were withdrawn. In view of circumstances of disappearance of Zavadsky D.A. it is not excluded that on the specified things withdrawn above and subjects can be; stains of blood or other traces concerning investigation...
The decision of criminal examinations from 10.08.2000 within the framework of investigation of criminal case N 414100.

To put on the sanction of experts the following questions are proposed:

1. Whether anything is present on a shovel withdrawn on 15.08.2000 from trunk of a motor vehicle of mark 'Volkswagen-golf', No. 33-85 KA, stratifications of ground, if yes they are suitable for the further research.

2. If on the shovel there is ground suitable for research of what district it belongs to?

3. whether  shovel has biological material present, and if yes is it suitable for the further identification research?

4. If is present and it is suitable, does it) belong to a person or an animal?

5. Whether  the shovel's biological material proves to belong to the victim Zavadskomu D.A.?

THE DECISION:
In case of detection of stratifications of ground, biological material or other traces, I ask you to provide where it was withdrawn from and in connection with possible subsequent research and presence of additional examinations. To put at the disposal of the experts:- a shovel with the wooden handle packed into a paper of white color, sealed and supplied (name of man who signed seal) and inscriptions on the package.

The public prosecutor of the department on supervision of investigation in the body of The Office of the Public Prosecutor of internal Affairs to inquiries.

The adviser of justice V.D.Shabun'ko
Conclusions of criminalistic examination from 10.09.2000 within the framework of investigation of criminal case N 414100 transport prosecutor's offices of the junior adviser of the justice of Shabunko V.D. for production judicial of examinations on criminal case No.19/17-2000 the shovel withdrawn from the trunk of a motor vehicle 'Volkswagen-golf', arrived. 33-85 KA.

September, 6, 2000 examination andidentification research of samples of blood of close relatives to Zavadsky D.A. (in addition were given Zavadsky A.V., by Zavadsky O.G., Zavadsky S.M., Zavadsky Y.D).

On September 20, 2000, laboratory subjects of Zavadsky, D.A.'s clothes were delivered (a jacket, a sweater and a knitted cap). All the arrived materials were in appropriate way packed and sealed, supplied with explanatory inscriptions, signatures of the inspector and attesting witnesses.

Through judicial examinations, the following questions were posed: 1); whether biolgical material is present on the sovel, and if yes, is it suitable for further identification and investigation?

CONCLUSIONS 1. On a surface given for research of the shovel there is biological (genetic) material of the person, suitable for investigation and identification research. 2. Biological (genetic) material belonging to a human detected in stratifications on the left lateral edge on the back surface of a metal edge of a shovel was that of Zavadsky D.A.
THE DECSION.

Expert N.N.Kozub
The search record of  book N1538 regarding issue and receptionof the weapon and ammunition to staff confinement center #1

Departments of Internal Affairs Minoblispolkoma from 27.11.2000,

signed Pontmi(?).
The decree on purpose(assignment) of criminalistic examination from 27.11.2000 within the framework of investigation of criminal case N 414100
The record of interrogation of witness Alkaeva O.L. from 24.11.2000 on 5 sheets of paper

The record of interrogation of the witness on November, 24, 2000, Interrogation is begun in Minsk at 10: 05a.m., it is finished at 13:35(1:35p.m).

The inspector - the deputy chief of a department of prosecutor's Office RB the adviser of the justice Kazakov E.G. in premise of Ministry of Internal Affairs RB with observance of requests No. 157, 158, 160

The witness being interrogated: the Surname, a name, a patronymic: Alkaev Oleg Leonidovich Chislo,

Month, a year of birth: 11.12.52

Citizenship: citizen Republic of Belarus

Language wished to use:: in Russian Birthplace: Leninsk-Kuznechk of the Kemerovo area Formation(education):

Marital status:is married

The Place of work, the position or the occupation: the Chief of investigatory isolator No. 1KIN, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, a rank the colonel of an internal service T

The office telephone Number: 220-65-28

Residence (constant and temporary) Minsk, street. Rogatzyovskya, 3, sq. 84

Home telephone number: 269-23-46

Previous conviction: We do not judge the Document certifying the personality No. MN-4 08019

Municipal Departments of Internal Affairs Mingorispolkoma, the Attitude(relation) to accused, lossed: informed data any

Correctness I certificate:Alkaeva
The witness: I've been in my current position(employment) since November, 6, 1996. Before me, this position was occupied by the colonel of  internal service Bakovets G.P., now he is chief ITK #14. The circle of my responsibilities includes maintenance of operative - investigatory process and the control of inmates according to requirements of sentancing. According to the Instruction of Ministry of Internal Affairs RB affirmed in 1992, I am the chief of Special group on execution of death sentences by shooting persons concerning  the sentence entered and the enforceability if there is a Decree from the President of the Republic of Belarus about refusal, or non-use of pardon. Shooting is made in one of the specially equipped premises, the site is known only to members of the special group: to the public prosecutor supervising the legitimacy of the execution of sentence, and also such underlings.
To the high officials of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.To the minister, the first deputy minister and chief KIN the Ministry of Internal Affairs and to the chief of Municipal Department of Internal Affairs Mingorispolkoma.

After receipt of the Decree from the President of the Republic of Belarus about denial, or non-issuance of a pardon concerning a specific prisoner through Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus and Municipal Department of Internal Affairs Mingorispolkoma, I within a month according to theverdict of the court am obliged to execute the death sentence against that person, and should inform in writing on execution of sentence to the court, we drow up specialregistration and accounting documents, stipulated by the court order - the following documents: certificate about the indentity convicted, the certificate about execution of the sentence and the certificate about a burial place of a corpse are constituted. The indicated documents are transmitted together in secret through KIN Ministry of Internal Affairs RB to storage along with the personal files of the shot convict. Taking into account, that the sort of activity of my special group is so specific, any decoding of documents insults the moral of the men under my command and results in protests within the group. As a rule, any by-standers are not present. This is not including the maximum officials of Ministry of Internal Affairs RB who are present periodically during the administering of sentences performance.. In career, I have carried into execution over 130 death sentences since 1996. From the maximum officials were present: first Udovikov M.D. Minister - twice there was chief KIN Kadushkin S.A.'s Ministry of Internal Affairs RB. He was present two or three times, now I do not remember. These people were there not with just idle curiosity, but with the purposes of improvement of organization of activity and supply of materials to our group. Except for the indicated persons and except for members of group, in my stay at execution of sentences no other persons participated. It not only concerning those persons, that I have indicated, but also in general any other by-standers; Somewhere in middle of October, 1999, Kadushkin S.A. in my office, acquainted me with commander SOBR Pavlichenko Dmitry and had told me, that minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Sivakov J.L. requires participation or presence of this person at execution of death sentences. Thus Kadushkin told me that as he tried to convince minister (Sivakov) to not allow it, but the minister categorically insisted Pavlichenko's presence. Obeying the instruction of the minister, transmitted to me through Kadushkin on October, 22, 1999- the day appointed for execution of the death sentence for, five convicts,  Pavlichenko, D was brought to the executions. Pavlichenko came in and was together with me and present during the shooting of five people, and was on location where we carried into execution, the sentences performed by the executors. For humane reasons and for  the purposes of reducing the sufferings of the convicted, the shooting is made by a shot in a nape from a pistol with the muffler.Pavlichenko, being present at shooting, had taken an interest in the executtioner - why does he not shoot at heart? In his opinion, it much more effective also does spill a lot of blood. From words of the executioner, Pavlichenko must be experienced, only a person who has practiced with various techniques could have such knowledge.. We made a burial of the corpses the next day. In the scheduled time, in the designated place, members of group met. Pavlichenko knew about it, but did not come. I did not wait for him to begin. He did not participate in a burial, He was only interested in the previous conversation on the location of the burial place. I havd told him, it is done in a cemetery, but a concrete place, I did not specify. Before New year 2000. Pavlichenko wa already to the position of brigade commander of team. He again came to me and was interested about date of the next shooting, and also asked me invite to him. I have explained to him, that I personally am not authorized to approve his presence, turned down his request. I never met with him again. The pistol for execution of death sentences is or remains deposited in the safe at the chief of the confinement center  No. 1 and on the day of performance of the sentences, it is issued to the executor.; I have access to this pistol and my deputy Saevich N.M. does also, as well as warrant officer, Shakal VI. No other people have access to the weapon. If the weapon is issued, its issue is recorded in the book of issue noting specifically, the party recieving the weapon in confinement center No. 1. This same record book keeps track of any other weapons issued from confinement center No. 1.. The pistol twice was issued, under the direct order) of minister Sivakova. under the following circumstances to persons having nothing to do with the special groups membersihip. The first time the gun was issued was - April, 30, 1999 a pistol was received by
Police Colonel. Dik V.N. upon the written rulin gof deputy Minsiter Chvankin A.A. for ostensibly implementation of training shootings. This directive in writing was shown to me by Dik, but he never left it to me. The gun was returned back on May 14, 1999. the next time the gun was received on September 16, 1999 by the Minister Sivadov's adjutant. I got a phone call from Kadushkin, who read out to me the Minister's oral injuncion, claiming that I must issue the gun to his adjutant Kolesnik V.P. the weapon was brought back on September 19, whcih is properly recorded in the book. The first time, reported armor-keeper and warrant officer, Shakal, V.I., the pistol was returned in unclean and rusty state. The second time it was returned in a normal condition. I can't tell for sure whether they fired from it. The first time, Shakal took away the gun from Dik in the police Ministry, while Dik went to Chvankin and took it from him. The second time, the Minister's adjutant recieved the gun from me and also returned it to me. There is nothing more I could add above what has already been said.
The protocol of dredging of pistol with muffler and books of issue and acceptance of the weapon and an ammunition to staff of confinement center No.1 Departments of Internal Affairs Minoblispolkoma from November, 24
The conclusion of criminalistic examination from 27.11.2000 on criminal case *414100
Click Here to make a link to this website
1

ßíäåêñ öèòèðîâàíèÿ